Hire a Dedicated Delphi Development Team
Hire a dedicated Delphi development team through Siblings Software when you need a self-contained squad to own VCL desktop work, FireMonkey cross-platform delivery, or a phased legacy modernization without building an in-house Object Pascal bench from scratch.
We assemble Delphi pods with a tech lead, senior Object Pascal engineers, QA inside the sprint, and a delivery lead who joins your ceremonies. Typical ramp is two to three weeks to sprint one. Monthly retainers run USD 12K to 60K depending on team size. This page covers when a dedicated Delphi squad fits, standard team composition, the first 30 days, governance, quality standards, pricing, comparison with alternatives, risks, and an example engagement shape.
If you only need one or two Delphi engineers embedded in your existing squad, see our Delphi staff augmentation page. For the broader outsourcing service, see Delphi development outsourcing.
Reviewed by Javier Uanini, Founder and CEO. Updated August 2026.
When a dedicated Delphi team makes sense
A dedicated Delphi team fits when the work spans multiple quarters, touches legacy binaries and new APIs at the same time, and needs its own release train with QA baked in. Common triggers we hear from CTOs and engineering managers:
Legacy desktop still runs the business. Scheduling, ERP, MES, or dispatch tools built in Delphi 7 or XE need upgrades, but nightly operations cannot pause for a rewrite.
Cloud APIs need to wrap old binaries. REST or gRPC services must expose data trapped in VCL data modules while the desktop UI catches up in parallel.
Internal hiring stalled. Object Pascal talent is scarce in many US markets. A pod buys runway while you recruit a permanent architect.
FireMonkey or mobile is on the roadmap. Shared Object Pascal logic between Windows and iOS or Android needs a team that understands FMX layout debt, not just VCL forms.
Contrast with staff augmentation when you already run sprint rituals and need extra senior hands. Contrast with project-based outsourcing when scope is fixed and short. The dedicated development team model fits multi-quarter roadmaps with one accountable pod.
The Legacy Delphi Readiness Test
We publish this checklist so buyers can self-diagnose before the discovery call. Three honest yes answers mean proceed with a dedicated pod. Any no means staff augmentation or a narrower fixed scope first.
Q1. Is production still on Delphi 7 or XE?
If the shipping build lacks a written upgrade path to current RAD Studio, plan phased migration with regression baselines, not a big-bang cutover.
Q2. Do batch jobs run in the desktop process?
Reports, ETL, or device polling inside the UI thread usually need extraction to services before you add mobile or web clients.
Q3. Does BDE or 32-bit VCL block 64-bit builds?
Map COM, BDE, and third-party component dependencies early. FireDAC and 64-bit targets change installer and deployment assumptions.
Official platform guidance lives in the RAD Studio documentation. We align upgrade plans with supported compiler and component versions before sprint one.
Standard team composition
A typical Delphi pod includes a Delphi tech lead, two to four senior Object Pascal engineers, QA automation inside the sprint, and a delivery lead. Optional seats: database specialist for FireDAC tuning, DevOps for installer and CI pipelines, UX for VCL or FMX screen refreshes.
Lean pod (4 to 5 people)
Tech lead plus two seniors and shared QA. USD 12K to 22K per month. Fits focused modernization or a single product line.
Standard pod (6 to 8 people)
Full leadership stack plus dedicated QA and optional integration engineer. USD 24K to 42K per month.
Program (10 plus people)
Multiple pods with shared platform bench for APIs, reporting, and release tooling. USD 45K to 60K plus per month.
When the roadmap also needs .NET services or a dedicated API team, we coordinate interfaces in discovery so Delphi and backend pods do not fork contracts.
Your first 30 days
Days 1 to 5
Discovery, repository access, architecture read, dependency audit on VCL packages and data modules, written team proposal with sprint-zero goals.
Days 6 to 12
Interviews, security onboarding, build scripts and DUnit or DUnitX harness wired, Definition of Done agreed.
Days 13 to 21
Sprint zero completes: first merges to a staging branch, smoke tests green, installer or deployment runbook draft.
Days 22 to 30
Sprint one delivery against an agreed goal. Weekly demo and retro with your stakeholders.
Governance and communication
Your product owner owns priorities. Our delivery lead runs sprint planning, standups, and stakeholder updates. The Delphi tech lead owns architecture decisions, code review SLA, and release readiness sign-off. We document decisions in short ADRs in your repository.
Escalation path: engineer to tech lead to delivery lead to your engineering director within one business day. IP is work-for-hire under US-style agreements. Source code lives in your org. We join your Slack, Jira or Linear, and on-call rotation when scoped.
Nearshore engineers from Latin America typically share four to six working hours with US Eastern and Central time. See our nearshore development page for overlap and communication detail.
Quality standards
Definition of Done includes peer review, automated tests where the codebase allows them, updated release notes, and staging deploy. For Delphi engagements we focus on memory profiling on long-running desktop sessions, FireDAC query plans on hot paths, and regression suites that cover critical data-module flows before compiler upgrades.
QA automation runs inside the sprint, not after it. We track escaped defects and sprint goal attainment on a shared dashboard. Security reviews follow OWASP baselines where the app exposes HTTP APIs or handles sensitive data.
Pricing model
Dedicated Delphi teams bill monthly and predictably within the USD 12K to 60K band:
Small pod
USD 12K to 22K / month
Four to five people. Initial three-month commitment, then month to month.
Standard pod
USD 24K to 42K / month
Six to eight people with full leadership and QA.
Program
USD 45K to 60K+ / month
Multi-pod engagements with shared platform support.
Two-week satisfaction guarantee on every seat. Scale down with 30-day notice after the initial period. Cost drivers include legacy depth, third-party VCL licensing, regulated environments, and whether FireMonkey mobile targets are in scope.
Dedicated team vs staff augmentation vs freelancers vs in-house
Dedicated Delphi pod. Best when migration, QA, and release ownership need one accountable squad for multiple quarters. You get a tech lead, delivery lead, and predictable monthly cost.
Staff augmentation. Best when you have Delphi architects in-house and need two or three senior engineers on your backlog for a defined period. Lower coordination overhead, you own ceremonies.
Freelancers. Can work for short fixes or isolated modules. Risk rises on knowledge transfer, timezone coverage, and who maintains DUnit suites after the contract ends.
In-house hiring. Right when Delphi is a permanent strategic stack and you can wait months to recruit Object Pascal specialists. Many clients start with a pod, then hire internally and taper the squad.
Example engagement
Illustrative scenario, not a published client case study.
Timberline Parts Distribution. A regional industrial distributor ran warehouse and order management on a Delphi 7 desktop suite tied to SQL Server. Releases happened twice a year. Leadership wanted live inventory visibility and a path to current RAD Studio without shutting down distribution centers.
A six-person pod (Delphi tech lead, three senior engineers, QA automation, delivery lead) spent sprint zero mapping data modules and third-party report components. Over two quarters the pod migrated core modules to current Delphi with FireDAC, extracted a REST API for a new operations dashboard built by an internal web team, and introduced nightly automated regression on critical posting flows. Installers moved to a staged rollout per warehouse region.
What we would do differently: inventory locking rules should have been documented before parallel UI and API work started. Duplicated validation caused rework in month four.
For published references see our case studies hub.
Risks and how we reduce them
Compiler upgrade stalls. We baseline behavior with automated tests and pilot upgrades on non-production branches before touching the shipping configuration.
Third-party VCL abandonment. Dependency audit in week one flags unsupported components. We plan replacements or wrappers before they block the critical path.
Knowledge trapped in one engineer. Pairing, ADRs, and recorded walkthroughs of data-module flows are part of Definition of Done, not optional extras.
Operations disruption during cutover. Parallel release tracks, feature flags where possible, and regional rollout plans keep warehouses and plants running.
Frequently Asked Questions
Run the Legacy Delphi Readiness Test on the discovery call. If two or three answers point to sustained ownership of migration, release trains, and QA, a pod with a Delphi tech lead and delivery lead beats adding one or two engineers. Staff augmentation fits when you already have Delphi architects in-house and need extra senior hands on a defined backlog.
Three questions we use before committing scope. Q1: Is production still on Delphi 7 or XE without a written upgrade path? Q2: Do batch jobs, reports, or device drivers run inside the same desktop process? Q3: Does BDE, COM, or 32-bit-only VCL block a 64-bit or cross-platform build? Two or more yes answers usually mean a dedicated squad with parallel workstreams, not a single embedded developer.
Discovery takes three to five days, interviews five to seven days, sprint zero in week two or three. Most pods merge first production changes by week four once repository access, build scripts, and regression baselines are in place.
Small pods run USD 12K to 22K per month. Full product pods run USD 24K to 42K. Multi-pod programs run USD 45K to 60K or more. All brackets include delivery leadership and a two-week satisfaction guarantee.
Yes. Most Delphi engagements we see start on code older than ten years. We audit data modules, component dependencies, and deployment scripts, then plan phased upgrades to current RAD Studio with FireDAC, automated regression suites, and parallel release tracks so daily operations keep running.
Your product owner sets priorities. Our Delphi tech lead owns code review SLAs, Definition of Done, and release readiness. The delivery lead runs ceremonies and weekly status with your stakeholders.
Adding seats takes one to two weeks. Scaling down requires 30-day notice after the initial commitment period.
OUR STANDARDS
Phased compiler upgrades over heroic rewrites. Regression baselines before release trains move.
Every Delphi engagement ships with visible quality gates, weekly demos, and honest reporting on the migration milestones we agreed to in discovery.
If you are interested in hiring developers for this capability in Argentina, visit the Argentina version of this page.
CONTACT US
Get in touch and build your idea today.